Question about "traditional" copyright

News, trends, and the future of publishing
Post Reply
Rachel Ventura
Posts: 152
Joined: September 30th, 2011, 12:29 am

Question about "traditional" copyright

Post by Rachel Ventura » October 4th, 2011, 12:02 am

I know in the U.S. (not sure about other countries/markets), a work is considered "copyrighted" the minute it's set on paper (or hard drive, nowadays). And I know you're not supposed to query agents until you've got a finished and polished product on your hands.

But is it advisable, necessary, or even allowable to register a copyright (at copyright.gov or wherever your country's office is) for a work before it's completed, i.e. even without a published date?

Form TX is the one for "literary or dramatic works," and it has separate fields for "creation date" and "publishing date." You can update any information as it changes, so it's OK to leave some fields blank AFAIK (so if/when the work is published you can update the date of publication in your account). But if you're not officially "finished," is it OK to file for a copyright anyway? Or should you wait until you've actually queried successfully and have an agent's representation?

Also, is it possible through these kind of sites, if at all, to register a copyright in your home country and foreign countries too?

User avatar
Mira
Posts: 1354
Joined: December 7th, 2009, 9:59 am
Contact:

Re: Question about "traditional" copyright

Post by Mira » October 7th, 2011, 4:20 pm

No idea! I think it's okay, but I'm not sure.

This would be a Nathan question!

User avatar
CharleeVale
Posts: 553
Joined: December 8th, 2009, 3:16 am
Contact:

Re: Question about "traditional" copyright

Post by CharleeVale » October 8th, 2011, 1:51 am

Completely unnecessary. According to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, copyright is automatic. Although if you intend on suing people for damages you will need to file for an actual copyright.

In this day and age 'intellectual property' is all the rage. I wouldn't worry, especially since you never know wether this manuscript will even really see the light of day if you know what I mean. Why stress out about it?

Chillax. : )

CV

Rachel Ventura
Posts: 152
Joined: September 30th, 2011, 12:29 am

Re: Question about "traditional" copyright

Post by Rachel Ventura » October 8th, 2011, 2:01 am

Thanks Charlee.

Although I might want to sue people for damages, but those are the people who've damaged me so much I end up obsessing about things like this.

Not the same thing as getting pirated on Napster or Rapidshare, obviously. ;)

User avatar
Nathan Bransford
Posts: 1562
Joined: December 4th, 2009, 11:17 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA
Contact:

Re: Question about "traditional" copyright

Post by Nathan Bransford » October 8th, 2011, 3:40 pm

CharleeVale wrote:Completely unnecessary. According to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, copyright is automatic. Although if you intend on suing people for damages you will need to file for an actual copyright.

In this day and age 'intellectual property' is all the rage. I wouldn't worry, especially since you never know wether this manuscript will even really see the light of day if you know what I mean. Why stress out about it?

Chillax. : )

CV
Yep.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests