Tense

The writing process, writing advice, and updates on your work in progress
User avatar
Sanderling
Posts: 187
Joined: July 3rd, 2011, 4:47 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Tense

Post by Sanderling » July 24th, 2011, 11:03 pm

meganstirler wrote:On a marginally related note, I read a novel in a southwest lit class once that was written in 2nd person present. The author told us that a writing teacher told him you couldn't write in 2nd person and he took it as a challenge. There were several points of view in the book and every time he introduced a new character he would start with something like, "you step out onto stage, where your audience waits". When he was done introducing the character he switched back to third person past.

As a reader it was excruciating and if I hadn't HAD to read it, I probably wouldn't have made it past the first chapter. But I've always remembered it - although I don't remember the book or author. As a writer, it is certainly a fascinating memory.
Well, at least he switched back to third person for most of the story! I agree, that would be really hard to read. Although... I wonder if maybe the whole thing had been done like that you'd eventually get used to it. I find sometimes that writing that I find to be tough slogging for the first half dozen pages eventually starts disappearing once the story picks up.
polymath wrote:I see your muse as a sort of dutch aunt, a prankster with the very best intentions behind her hijinks. Even her sterness and bluntness, through thinly veiled verbal ironies, are intended to persuade best outcomes. Let's see, who might that be? One of the Moirae, whom even the gods fear? Perhaps Lachesis? Daughter of Nyx. The apportioner. The alloter of destiny. She's not much of a prankster. Sober serious. Fate can play inconveniently life-affirming and humbling pranks though. Situational ironies.
I love that image, polymath: my muse as the middle Fate, who determines the path and length of life. How appropriate that she should be a daughter of night, too, since she seems to be at her best in those darkened hours.
lvcabbie wrote:I just read a novel by a major author's standin that was done in present tense - I actually found it okay to read once I got used to it.
I think that's probably true for all the POV/tense combinations, lvcabbie. If we're used to reading mostly in one style, we'll probably find switching to another a little distracting until we can get into the story and forget about the writing.
washingtonwriter1968 wrote:Present Tense as a whole feels jarring for me,unless it's third person.I guess for my mind someone;a character telling me what they are doing as they are doing feels.... unrealistic. I primarily write in past tense I have noticed. Maybe because it is comfortable and tried and true, I do not know for sure.
I felt this way about the first book or two I read in present tense. Now it seems half the books I've read recently have been present tense, and I hardly even notice anymore. Maybe it partly depends on how conscious you are that it's a story being related to you. I think it's always this way in books, because written text feels like it's a documentation of past events, but if you think about story in visual format... for instance, if you have a movie playing on the screen (the equivalent of a book in your hands) with descriptive audio for the visually impaired, they won't be using past tense as they relate the events of the movie, they'll be using present tense. Just think of the present-tense book in your hands as the written version of the descriptive audio describing the actions of the characters.
polymath wrote:I believe readers' reading comfort zones as pertains to tense and person are affected by how objective or subjective a report is. Too subjective unsettles some readers. Too objective unsettles other readers. Too artless objectivity or subjectivity unsettles many readers.
This is an interesting observation, polymath. I wonder how much of that would be conscious? I think quite a bit of the way we take in and understand the books we read is on a subconscious level, such that figuring out why we like one book and not another can sometimes be tricky. Maybe the same pertains to tenses/POV. We can tell that we dislike the POV and find it jarring, but do we really understand why we find it that way?
My blog / Twitter
.
"Because if you have at least a modicum of talent and if you live by these six rules, you will make it."
--Robert J. Sawyer, speaking here of Heinlein's Rules.

User avatar
polymath
Posts: 1821
Joined: December 8th, 2009, 11:22 am
Location: Babel
Contact:

Re: Tense

Post by polymath » July 24th, 2011, 11:39 pm

polymath wrote:I believe readers' reading comfort zones as pertains to tense and person are affected by how objective or subjective a report is. Too subjective unsettles some readers. Too objective unsettles other readers. Too artless objectivity or subjectivity unsettles many readers.
Sanderling wrote:This is an interesting observation, polymath. I wonder how much of that would be conscious? I think quite a bit of the way we take in and understand the books we read is on a subconscious level, such that figuring out why we like one book and not another can sometimes be tricky. Maybe the same pertains to tenses/POV. We can tell that we dislike the POV and find it jarring, but do we really understand why we find it that way?
I think a good deal of reading's power is subconscious in many ways, not just person and tense. Whatever qualities of narrative point of view affects readers consciously or subconsciously varies widely from reader to reader. Asking and answering why we find it that way turns a feeling into a hunch into a conscious realization.

I've made it a mission in life to consciously perceive as much as possible. Subtext is more than a literary quality. It's hidden agendas and motivations that if appreciated can prevent harms or avoid missing out on la vita locus. As far as reading and writing goes, more better reading and writing experiences. Life, more fulfilling.
Spread the love of written word.

Sommer Leigh
Moderator
Posts: 1624
Joined: April 2nd, 2010, 11:07 pm
Location: Omaha, NE
Contact:

Re: Tense

Post by Sommer Leigh » July 25th, 2011, 11:50 am

I usually write in past tense, but my current work is in first person present. I hate it at first, but when I would start writing again, I would automatically start writing it in first person present. My story is a superhero story and I think that might be why it feels more *right* in first person present - that is a very comic book way to write and read. I have since stopped fighting it and just rolled with the first person present. I actually like it a lot more now. I have alternating points of view, too. Every other chapter is written by a teenage superhero girl and the other is written by a teenage supervillain boy.

I read a good book no matter what the tense is.
May the word counts be ever in your favor. http://www.sommerleigh.com
Be nice, or I get out the Tesla cannon.

User avatar
Sanderling
Posts: 187
Joined: July 3rd, 2011, 4:47 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Tense

Post by Sanderling » July 25th, 2011, 12:22 pm

polymath wrote:I think a good deal of reading's power is subconscious in many ways, not just person and tense. Whatever qualities of narrative point of view affects readers consciously or subconsciously varies widely from reader to reader. Asking and answering why we find it that way turns a feeling into a hunch into a conscious realization.

I've made it a mission in life to consciously perceive as much as possible. Subtext is more than a literary quality. It's hidden agendas and motivations that if appreciated can prevent harms or avoid missing out on la vita locus. As far as reading and writing goes, more better reading and writing experiences. Life, more fulfilling.
That's true, polymath. Charlee just posted a thread about mood in books affecting how much one likes the story, and for me that's an entirely subconscious thing.

I've often wondered where that "click" we sometimes feel with certain people comes from (or the "anti-click" for people we instantly dislike). Perhaps it's another recognition of some particular something at a subconscious level. Oh, if we could only tap into our subconscious and know what it was thinking.
Sommer Leigh wrote:I usually write in past tense, but my current work is in first person present. I hate it at first, but when I would start writing again, I would automatically start writing it in first person present. My story is a superhero story and I think that might be why it feels more *right* in first person present - that is a very comic book way to write and read. I have since stopped fighting it and just rolled with the first person present. I actually like it a lot more now. I have alternating points of view, too. Every other chapter is written by a teenage superhero girl and the other is written by a teenage supervillain boy.

I read a good book no matter what the tense is.
I'm glad to hear it happened to you, too, Sommer! Mine doesn't feel like an unusual story setup, or not any of the usual present-tense scenarios, anyway... but I'm a pantser, so who knows how it might develop. ;)

I love your concept, btw. The villains rarely get a chance to tell their side of the story.
My blog / Twitter
.
"Because if you have at least a modicum of talent and if you live by these six rules, you will make it."
--Robert J. Sawyer, speaking here of Heinlein's Rules.

User avatar
polymath
Posts: 1821
Joined: December 8th, 2009, 11:22 am
Location: Babel
Contact:

Re: Tense

Post by polymath » July 25th, 2011, 1:07 pm

Sanderling wrote:I've often wondered where that "click" we sometimes feel with certain people comes from (or the "anti-click" for people we instantly dislike). Perhaps it's another recognition of some particular something at a subconscious level. Oh, if we could only tap into our subconscious and know what it was thinking.
Actually, there are a number of systems for tapping into subconscious thought. There's meditation, prayer, fasting, social isolation retreats, auto self-suggestion, dreaming and interpretation thereof, mystical esoterics like crystal ball scrying and clairvoyance. My way involves a cornucopia of situationally appropriate methods, including knowledge and experience of situational scenarios based on decorum's principles, Suit one's thoughts, words, and deeds to the circumstances, the subject matter, and the audience.

Semiotics and semantics theory base "reading" other people's subconscious intents and meanings on what their appearances, words, and actions signal. Clicking with someone on a first encounter runs a gamut from like mindedness causing instant rapport to ambitions, interests, and desires raising curiosity, which also builds rapport. Understanding and interpreting nonverbal communication is an awesome and fraught with hazards process. Instant dislike runs the same gamuts, only antirapport building from fear and indifference.

Today, I encountered a grumpy gus in a parking lot. His facial expression signaled frustration. His gait signaled purposeful intent that would brook no delays. He was short and stout and whipcord compact, a fireplug, mean looking, ready to bite off my head and use my windpipe for an outhouse if I so much as said hi. I spoke to him, menancing stranger that he was, asking if he had some quarters he could sell me so I could feed the meter. He smiled, a momentary flash of humor sparkling in his eyes. "There's a half hour left over on my meter that's yours." His voice was gentle, firm, and generous. I thanked him, said, "that'll do nicely," and moved my car into his spot after he left.

And then there's the one least recognized but most practical method for tapping the subconscious. Free writing.
Spread the love of written word.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests