Careful Revision vs. Seizing Opportunity...
Posted: February 4th, 2010, 9:21 pm
Dear Fellow Writers,
Sorry to be introducing myself in the forums with a question of my own... I've been lurking, but haven't the experience to think I had anything to add to your own questions and instead just learned along with you as I read the responses.
I am currently facing a "to query or not to query" dilemma. I am working on a memoir about my friendship with a homeless man, but I am only on the third draft, and it feels very undercooked. I had planned on finishing the work over the next year, and then querying agents.
HOWEVER, I have stumbled on to some very good luck; an abbreviated essay version of the first four chapters has been published in a prestigious literary journal and the essay has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Now, I have only a number of months between being able to say that I have been nominated in a query letter, and having instead to say that I was nominated but did not win. (Winning would be nice, but I certainly don't want to bank on it, and in truth imagine it's a very unlikely thing.)
What I currently have is raw; I could have something half-cooked in a couple of months, provided I stopped doing frivolous things like sleeping and reading publishing industry blogs. (Not this one, of course, this one is essential to my daily well-being!)
Would you query with a manuscript whose later chapters were still fairly rough in order to seize the opportunity to say you were a current nominee for a prestigious prize, or would you hold off on querying until you were fully satisfied that you had taken your work as far as you could on your own? (Which is, of course, a lie. No manuscript is ever written by one person alone. So maybe instead I should say, "...as far as you and your trusted readers can take it toward finished?")
Thanks in advance for your input, and I promise that as soon as I know anything at all about publishing, I will join in answering the questions you post.
S
Sorry to be introducing myself in the forums with a question of my own... I've been lurking, but haven't the experience to think I had anything to add to your own questions and instead just learned along with you as I read the responses.
I am currently facing a "to query or not to query" dilemma. I am working on a memoir about my friendship with a homeless man, but I am only on the third draft, and it feels very undercooked. I had planned on finishing the work over the next year, and then querying agents.
HOWEVER, I have stumbled on to some very good luck; an abbreviated essay version of the first four chapters has been published in a prestigious literary journal and the essay has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Now, I have only a number of months between being able to say that I have been nominated in a query letter, and having instead to say that I was nominated but did not win. (Winning would be nice, but I certainly don't want to bank on it, and in truth imagine it's a very unlikely thing.)
What I currently have is raw; I could have something half-cooked in a couple of months, provided I stopped doing frivolous things like sleeping and reading publishing industry blogs. (Not this one, of course, this one is essential to my daily well-being!)
Would you query with a manuscript whose later chapters were still fairly rough in order to seize the opportunity to say you were a current nominee for a prestigious prize, or would you hold off on querying until you were fully satisfied that you had taken your work as far as you could on your own? (Which is, of course, a lie. No manuscript is ever written by one person alone. So maybe instead I should say, "...as far as you and your trusted readers can take it toward finished?")
Thanks in advance for your input, and I promise that as soon as I know anything at all about publishing, I will join in answering the questions you post.
S