polymath wrote:The risk is writing an idea that's currently in great supply and low demand won't be well received. That's not an absolute though.
Yeah, pretty much. Contemporary fantasy is a special animal. There would seem to be two levels of ideas at work, and they are hard to define and differentiate. One level can be used and reused, and the reader doesn't seem to mind. Multiple pantheons coexisting. Particular creatures : vampires, werewolves, faeries. No one looks at those ideas and thinks, "Oh, you are such a copycat! You stole that from so-n-so!" Other ideas can only be used a
very limited number of times before the reader
quickly dismisses a writer as derivative. Those ideas...are hard to define. I think it's relatively safe to say they're the ideas that are more tailored, more specific, more like one author's personal extrapolation of myth or magic. For instance, in Ilona Andrews's books, either magic works or technology works but not both that the same time, and the switch occurs without warning. I don't think someone else could use this without drawing reader rancor. I don't think someone could write about a professional zombie-raiser without being dismissed as a Hamilton rip-off.
Fenris, if you don't already, you gotta start reading voraciously in the genre. Gaiman, De Lint, Mieville, Hamilton, Briggs - these are a handful of the leaders on the adult side. However, I thought I saw you call your work YA somewhere on the forum. I don't know who the stars of YA contemporary fantasy are, but I bet a few people around here could tell you if you asked.
Edit: I should amend this to point out that while AMERICAN GODS is adult contemp fantasy, Gaiman is just as famous for writing for other age groups. Coraline, for instance.