Fenris wrote:But if you want to make your characters seem dynamic and more like real people, you can't put them through trial after trial and have them come out just as happy and cheery as they were at the beginning.
Absolutely. Of course, one of the best pieces of writing advice I've ever been given is this: No, you can't let your characters be happy, ever, even for a little while. Happy
ending notwithstanding.
Fenris wrote:In a dynamic sense, the wisecracks are not meant to relieve tension from the plot so much as tension from the other characters, to keep them sane and in (relatively) high spirits.
Here would be where we differ. I don't want my characters in high spirits. Determined, yes. Desperate. Progressively hopeless. If the stakes are high and the odds set against them, I don't think they
should be in high spirits. If the stakes aren't high, and the odds don't appear insurmountable, it's doubtful to me that the reader will worry for the characters or even stick with them very long.
I was reading a fantasy ms for a friend. He had a scene wherein his hero was about to be arrested and thrown into a horrible dungeony place, someplace from which people never escaped. Dark, dank, stinking, labyrinthine, monster-infested, etc. And the hero stands there and says something like, "I know I'll get out of this, and I'll come back to get you for this." And I thought, well if he knows he's going to be okay, then why should I worry? Why should I even be interested?
Fenris wrote:Also, every book has to have its low points (as in low in action and intensity, not low as in bad), or the high points wouldn't feel any different, and the book would lose its vitality.
I do agree that action and intensity must have lulls, though those should never be 'low' as in low-tension, low-conflict.
Fenris wrote:So in that way, using wisecracks wisely (pun unintended, I'm sorry :) ) shows that the characters haven't let their recent challenges get them down, and that there's life in them yet (and therefore in the book itself).
But I do think the challenges should get them down, or else it wasn't really a struggle, was it? They always knew they'd come through. Spirits high, no worries. I would relate this to a post Nathan made about character choices only having an impact if it's clear that the character had the ability and capability to make the opposite choice. Is it a challange if the characters are never in danger of losing and never lose confidence, never doubt themselves, never have an all-hope-is-lost but we're going on anyway moment?
Fenris wrote:Of course, this is just my take on the subject; others may well think differently.
LOL. Yeah, I'm used to that myself.