Re: Query: Use Somebody *Updated*
Posted: June 27th, 2010, 10:32 pm
Instead of "Use Somebody" as the title of my novel, what do you think of RUNNING FROM THE LIGHT?
Agree with other comments that there are a lot of things going on here, sci-fi, religion, romance. Also, your protag is a convicted murderer. I must admit that felt a bit glossed over in the query. If she really killed someone then I think the religious aspects and the search for penance would be strengthened to some reference to her past sins. This just sounds like she has a crush of Jesus boy. If God is integral (which I suspect from the inspirational romance genre) then she needs to have more of a religious conversion than just trying to get into a hot guy's pants. There is a lot going on, and I think you really need to focus on what is most important and find a way to tie the various elements together.OneChoice1 wrote:You made very good points Mfreivald, thank you.
With everyone's help, I'm starting to like this query *lol*
So tell me...what's good, bad, ugly?
#5
Dear [Agent’s name]:
Seventeen year old so technically it should be Seventeen-year-old since this is a compound attributive adjective Rachel McSwain is serving a life sentence for murder and identity theft is identity theft a charge? not sure but it sounds strange after murder when she’s handed a deal from the US government. Instead of growing old in prison, she opts for a cerebral microchip implant which stuns her with neurological pain i think this is redundant since all pain is "neurological" tho I think you mean her brain hurts... if she tries to physically harm someone. The government puts Rachel to the test when they place her in a remote Washington town for thirteen months. She now has epilepsy as a cover story.
Disturbed and bitter, Rachel’s i wouldn't use a contraction here, just a suggestion tho determined to find her sanity and live these months in peace; but she starts receiving messages from a secret admirer who knows too much about her. She doesn’t respond to the letters but resolves to discover the identity of this psycho.
A narrow escape from an errant skateboard introduces her to its owner, Alan Pierce. He takes a liking to her sarcastic humor and wants to show her why he worships Jesus Christ. But Rachel has no desire to hear about forgiveness or repentance. Unfortunately, Alan’s persistence and turquoise eyes lure her to take a chance on love. The problem is, he’s more interested in showing her the way of Christ than expressing love, and what’s worse, his beautiful eyes are fixed on another.
She attempts to make Alan fall in love with her—taking advice from romance novels, magazines serial comma and movies—which distracts her from the goal of finding out who her admirer is. He hasn’t forgotten about her, though, and decides it’s time for them to meet. How is Rachel supposed to defend herself with her crippling chip?
USE SOMEBODY is an inspirational romance and is approximately blah blah blah words. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
And I thank you again.Also, your protag is a convicted murderer. I must admit that felt a bit glossed over in the query. If she really killed someone then I think the religious aspects and the search for penance would be strengthened to some reference to her past sins.
Good start.OneChoice1 wrote:
Rachel McSwain's always running. From her abusive father, bullets, and cops.
Whoa. What conspiracy? What is she mixed up in?When she's betrayed by a co-conspirator, Rachel lands a life sentence for murder.
Awkward. The last thing she expects is being. Presented. Like she expects many things and this is the last. The last is a second. And she's already serving 'life', and now a second chance at life. Using life to mean two opposite things. Is the best term for getting a second chance "being presented"? The resonance of your words and terms seems off.The last thing this seventeen year old expects is being presented with a second chance at life.
Awkward. All she has to do is live?All she has to do to keep her freedom is live
Awkward. All she has to do is live for a trial period?in a remote Washington town for a trial period of thirteen months
Is there any way to avoid mentioning Washington again? Better to move forward than repeat.with a experimental microchip implanted in her brain. Before she's sent to Washington,
Odd phrase, "bail out of the deal", using a jail/legal term "bail" as a cliche for opt out. May be confusing to a fast-reading agent.Rachel tries to bail out of the deal,
In turn to what? Omit.and in turn,
"It renders" Improper tense/word choice to relate to "purpose". It's purpose is to render. Or, perhaps omit the colon and simply say, ",which is to render her"discovers the purpose of the chip: it renders her incapable of physically harming anyone without suffering excruciating pain herself.
"Bitter from her limitations" is grammatically incorrect and/or clumsy. Bitter because of (or due to) her limitations.Now she has no choice but to play along.
A narrow escape from an errant skateboard introduces her to Alan Pierce. He enjoys her sarcastic humor and wants to show her why he worships Jesus Christ. Bitter from her limitations,
Awkward to, in effect, say she has no desire for this but does have desire for that. The double desire is alright, but it could be presented more elegantly. More clearly, and with more tension. For starters, it is always stronger to say what she is thinking and does desire, than to rely on what she has "no desire" for.Rachel has no desire to hear about forgiveness or repentance even as Alan's persistence and turquoise eyes lure her to take a chance on love.
Awkward. Here you, in effect, say the problem is...and then another problem is. Can you simply say, "But he's more interested..." to eliminate one of the "problem is"s?The problem is, he’s more interested in showing her the way of Christ, and what’s worse, his beautiful eyes are fixed on another.
Awkward. Words like "dissuade" and "attempts to" are weak in a query, and don't convey any longing or emotional desire.That doesn’t dissuade her, and she attempts to make Alan fall for her—taking advice from romance novels, magazines and movies.
Hangs around Alan? Awkward. Unromantic. And unspecific. How about spends time with Alan, or something.The more she hangs around Alan, the more she remembers her past and relives it.
The phrases "tries to use her pursuit" "distraction from history" and "efforts are fruitless" lack the punch needed to make this situation sizzle. Can you lay this out for us in less sophisticated terms and more viscerally? Illuminating the emotion behind it?Rachel tries to use her pursuit of love as a distraction from history, but her efforts are fruitless.
Same for "harbors resentment" (how about 'feels anger') and "it gets to the point where"She harbors resentment for Alan, and it gets to the point where it takes her crippling chip to stop her from hurting him.
What suffering, for how long? You've given no background on Rachel. So all we can say is okay...Rachel refuses to believe an almighty God allowed her to suffer for as long as she did, or that she could be redeemed.
An odd ending in that we haven't seen Alan's faith in her. Faith in her for what?She'll never see the light. Alan should spend his energy elsewhere—like falling in love with her. Since he won't, Rachel plans to murder his faith in her by revealing her sins.
Inspirational, how? Not sure how you've shown this above. Romance, how. Not sure you've shown this above.RUNNING FROM THE LIGHT is an inspirational romance
How many words? Also, no need to say approximately. Simply round up or down to the nearest thousand.and is approximately blah blah blah words. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
OneChoice1 wrote:Merci beaucoup Quill. At least I had a good start ;). I have "blah blah blah," because I'm still editing/rewriting my story. But I'm aiming for 100,000-120,000 words. I believe that's a good range..
Rolling out #8
Dear [Agent’s name]:
Rachel McSwain’s always running. From her abusive father, bullets, and cops. When she ends up facing a life sentence for murder, Rachel sprints toward the first opportunity of freedom, which comes in the form of an experimental microchip being implanted in her brain. The chip renders her incapable of physically harming anyone without suffering excruciating pain herself. A thirteen month trial period in a remote Washington town will determine Rachel’s fate.
I like this much better. The first and second sentences (the second is a fragmant) probably should be joined into one. I don't think I'd use a fragment in a query letter. The third sentence is long and might be broken up. I think you could simplify the next sentence about the effect of the chip. "The chip causes excruciating pain whenever Rachel physically harms another person."
A narrow escape from an errant skateboard introduces her to Alan Pierce. Her limited tolerance for him is further damaged when Alan wants to show her why he worships Jesus Christ. Not believing in God, Rachel has no desire to hear about Calvary or resurrections. Alan’s persistent, but instead of opening up to Jesus, Rachel keeps finding herself getting lost in Alan’s stupid turquoise eyes.
I'd lose the word stupid.
At first, Rachel puts off her attraction as a silly little crush, but when she loses her temper and hits one of Alan’s admirers, things get serious. The distress from her microchip knocks her unconscious. Rachel wakes up to Alan praying for her feverishly, and decides to take a chance on love. Three problems: her stay in Washington is inadequate; Alan’s more interested in showing her the way of Christ; and even worse, his eyes are fixed on another. How could committing murder be easier than falling in love?
"Puts off" sounds like the wrong phrase. "Puts her attraction down to a crush"? Her stay in Washington is inadequate? Is she going to be free after the trial period, in which case she could go (or stay) anywhere she wants? Or is she going to be forced to leave? I like the last line, but you bring up the murder again. It may be necessary to add a few words in the first paragraph about that, though I'm not sure.
Now Rachel’s determined to win Alan’s heart before her time runs out. If that means cracking open the Bible and getting to know this Jesus Christ fellow, than so be it.
Why is time going to run out? It's a good way to raise the stakes. I just don't understand why, if the chip will give her her freedom.
RUNNING FROM THE LIGHT is an inspirational romance and is blah blah blah words. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
I am being tough on you I know! This is miles better than the earlier version I read. Still, I think there is still room for improvement. You have definitely tied things together more effectively, but there are definitely spots that feel over-written, the diction especially is off-putting at times. (Not a hard thing to change btw) And I still feel that because RUNNING FROM THE LIGHT is an inspirational romance, you may want to include some evidence of Rachel developing a relationship with God. But that is just a suggestion.OneChoice1 wrote:Thank you Meredith for pointing out the things you did!
Well I don't know if this is any better, but it's what I have so far.
#...uh, 9
Dear [Agent’s name]:
Rachel McSwain’s always running. From her abusive father, bullets, cops, and now prison. stronger opening for sure, the second sentence is a fragment, I think it works but be aware of it, also I might drop "cops" just a suggestion tho She’s serving a life sentence for murder before she opts for an experimental microchip to be implanted in her brain, rendering her incapable of physically harming anyone without suffering excruciating pain herself. i might break this into two sentences, feels a bit lengthy A thirteen month i would put a hyphen thirteen-month trial period trial period in a remote Washington town will determine if she gets to keep her freedom.
A narrow escape from an errant skateboard introduces her to Alan Pierce. Her limited tolerance for him is further damaged this is awkwardly worded, tolerance being damaged? be careful your subjects and verbs jive when Alan wants to show her why he worships Jesus Christ. Rachel has no desire to hear about Calvary or resurrections. Alan’s persistent, but instead of opening up to Jesus, Rachel keeps getting lost in Alan’s turquoise eyes. i thought she had limited tolerance for him?
At first, Rachel thinks of her attraction as a silly little crush, but when she loses her temper and hits one of Alan’s admirers, she’s forced to acknowledge her feelings for what they are. one of Alan's admirers? feels writerly to me, not natural or genuine Her situation gets as serious as the distress from the microchip, this doesn't work for me, feels forced and again, over-written, also could you focus more on the microchip? does experiencing acute pain expose the experiment to the public? what are the ramifications, physical political etc etc and she decides to take a chance on love. take a chance on love is a cliche, sorry But Alan’s more interested in showing her the way of Christ, and even worse, his eyes are fixed on another. How could committing murder be easier than falling in love? wait what? i still feel like the convicted murderer aspect is a bit swept under the rug so this sentence feels jarring, not to mention that rhetorical questions are a BIG no no for many agents
Now Rachel’s set on winning Alan’s heart before she’s pulled out of Washington. If that means cracking open the Bible and getting to know this Jesus Christ fellow, fellow? i think you can pick a better word than then not than so be it.
RUNNING FROM THE LIGHT is an inspirational romance and is blah blah blah words. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,