MattLarkin wrote:Rachel Ventura wrote:A nickel a word doesn't sound like much in print, but when you do the math, an average 75K word ms works out to $3,750.

This is something I'd love to look into, but four grand is
waaaaay out of my ballpark. Which sucks
big time, because any non-zero integer is above that line too.
Many pro editors will do a 75k novel for less than that. Perhaps $1500 to $2000, depending on the editor.
If the non-zero integers weren't in there I might be able to afford it...

It'd be nice if these services operated on a "no fee unless successful" model, i.e. in the hands of someone who would actually pay you, and then you the editor. But then the editors might not be too successful either, now would they?

Kind of like traditional publishing, then. Except asking someone to gamble on you, without claiming the high percent if they win?
The "no fee unless successful" model is what trial lawyers promote. The trick is, they settle, which constitutes a marginal "success." (Well, a marginal victory, and a huge success for the lawyer.)

No, I'd like to see a more level playing field where the gambler wins but so does the race horse.
Typically, the person making the gamble gets the chance at the big payoff. Otherwise, what's the benefit in the risk? In self-publishing, you pay up front, but if you're successful, you more than recap. In traditional, the editor pays, but if the book does well, you still only get a small percentage.
Trouble is, you're usually only successful if you, yourself, put in all the effort. And not everyone can be an expert in everything. I read some article from a British paper saying that Amanda Hocking struggled with depression all her life and signed with St. Martins because of burnout. She's probably very introverted like I am, really shy and a little eccentric; the article said that her decision to self-publish (and the immense success thereafter) was a fluke, that she just wanted a relatively quick way to make $300 to get a ticket to some Muppets festival in Minneapolis or something.

She's not at all a brash go-getter like John Locke or Joe Konrath. She's, well, just a kid. A kid with a sort of quirky obsession with '80s artifacts (she mentions the John Hughes movies a lot) and a desire to create something a lot like the Jim Henson flicks and TV shows she probably watched growing up. (All of which I loved too.) A kid who did a lot of work that was probably 80 million light-years away from her comfort zone and deservedly achieved success because of it. But she's set a standard, one that's tough to meet, never mind beat. Not everyone is going to be a Hocking or a Locke or a Konrath; proof of concept doesn't automatically create a "trend." I'd think most people self-pubbing would hope to be. Otherwise... where's the benefit in the risk?
Amanda said she hired a freelance editor but that even still, she doesn't think her books were written well, and felt she coulda-shoulda-woulda worked on them more to make them better. Myself, I'm every bit a perfectionist and would want something what's called a "developmental editor" to get things on a good path right away. I don't know how much these folks charge, but it's worth looking into. (If only I could have some time, a loan, and time alone to look into these things.)
